A persistent form of inequality prevalent in today’s world is the digital divide. The way people learn, work, access services, and engage in public life is influenced by connectivity, devices, and digital skills. In Latin America, nearly three out of every ten people remain without internet access, a disparity that the pandemic has revealed to have a profound impact on education, employment, and overall wellbeing. Urban equity now hinges on digital inclusion, which has shifted from a technical concern to a fundamental social right.
What We Mean by Digital Divide
The digital divide is understood globally as a multidimensional phenomenon, and leading institutions converge on this idea from different angles. UN‑Habitat defines it as the gap between those who have access to and can use Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) connectivity, devices, and digital skills, and those who cannot, emphasizing the foundational role of infrastructure and literacy. UNU‑MERIT expands this view by framing the digital divide as “several gaps in one,” shaped by social and economic inequalities and encompassing technological, content, gender, and commercial divides. The OECD adds a territorial and socioeconomic lens, describing digital divides as inequalities that emerge across geography, education, age, income, and firm size. These definitions collectively highlight that the digital divide is a multifaceted issue, comprising interconnected disparities in infrastructure, skills, affordability, and social conditions, which cities must tackle to create equitable digital futures.
In contrast to digital exclusion, digital inclusion involves a deliberate and coordinated approach to overcome structural obstacles, ensuring that everyone can access and benefit from ICTs through targeted policies, infrastructures, and community-driven initiatives. The United Nations stresses that digital inclusion is about ensuring everyone, everywhere has equal, purposeful, and secure opportunities to use, lead, and design technologies and services.
Bridging the digital divide with inclusion and equity. (Illustration: Adobe Stock)
Where Digital Inequality Persists
Digital inequality is a complex issue, characterized by its persistence and mutually reinforcing layers. The way people access and use technology is influenced by multiple, overlapping conditions rather than a single barrier. One of the most noticeable inequalities is the difference in territories, where rural, peri-urban, and low-income urban areas typically experience slower internet speeds, have fewer providers, and pay higher costs. Despite the availability of infrastructure, many households face affordability barriers, struggling to afford devices or maintain stable data plans, and often resorting to shared or mobile-only internet access. The exclusion of older adults and low-income families is further exacerbated by skills and confidence gaps, as they often struggle with digital literacy, making it difficult for them to safely and effectively navigate online services. Meaningful engagement with digital services is hindered by complex interfaces, inaccessible design, and concerns about privacy, which also undermine usability and trust. Initiatives often become isolated or duplicated, and fail to tackle structural inequities, due to fragmented governance. These inequalities collectively decide who can fully engage in digital society and who is left behind, missing out on essential daily life opportunities.
Cities cannot govern digital inclusion without granular, ethical, and interoperable data. Robust data flows are essential to understanding who is excluded, where gaps persist, and which interventions generate real impact. They help identify the reasons behind exclusion, reveal where territorial inequalities concentrate, highlight which public services are underused or inaccessible, and show how digitalization affects different demographic groups.
A common set of principles that prioritize people are shared by effective digital inclusion strategies.
-
- To guarantee public services are usable across devices, languages, and abilities, they focus on mobile-first, multilingual, and accessible design.
-
- Recognizing that affordability is key to participation, they provide free or low-barrier access to devices and connectivity.
-
- Community learning hubs provide digital literacy support, empowering residents to build confidence and skills.
-
- Public services that reduce friction, duplication, and administrative burden are promoted to ensure interoperability.
-
- To build trust and safeguard rights, they adhere to strict standards for privacy, consent, and data protection.
Digital inclusion is successful when people can confidently, safely, and meaningfully use technology, and digital systems create opportunities instead of widening existing gaps.
Catalonia: Innovation for Social Rights
Catalonia has emerged as one of Europe’s most compelling examples of digital inclusion driven by social innovation. At the heart of this transformation, the Taula del Tercer Sector, representing more than 3,000 social organizations, today plays a central role in advancing digital rights and equity.
Through its flagship initiative m4Social, the Taula promotes digital rights, accelerates the digital transformation of social entities, and generates rigorous evidence on digital inequalities. The portfolio showcases a mature, ecosystem-based approach, featuring initiatives such as the Open Data Space for the Social Sector, which promotes transparency and shared learning; SimbioTIC, which drives large-scale digital transformation across social organizations; the Chatbot for Social Assistance, which expands access to information and services; xSocial, which enhances coordination in community care.
The collaboration between the government, social organizations, and the tech ecosystem in Catalonia demonstrates how to create a more inclusive digital future. For a long time, policymakers recognized the existence of the digital divide, but they needed concrete evidence to measure it and develop effective strategies. That changed with the creation of the Catalan Digital Divide Index. The Index achieved this by turning a perceived problem into a measurable one, thereby enabling targeted, data-driven interventions and establishing digital inclusion as a fundamental aspect of social rights.
Argentina: Community‑Based Inclusion
The case of Argentina provides a contrasting yet equally instructive example. The country has achieved significant progress in expanding access to connectivity, which now reaches 88% of the population, although territorial and socioeconomic disparities persist. Punto Digital, the country’s largest digital inclusion program, has emerged as a vital cornerstone of community-based access in this context. These public spaces, spanning hundreds of municipalities, offer a range of services, including free connectivity, digital literacy training, workshops, and cultural activities. The key to their success is their ability to reach underserved communities, which are frequently neglected by market-driven digital growth.
With one of the region’s largest community-based digital inclusion networks, Punto Digital‘s widespread territorial presence provides a solid foundation for the country’s next stage of digital transformation. The current challenge lies in linking this thriving ecosystem to wider social, educational, and urban policies, allowing local achievements to amplify and support each other. To increase the impact of initiatives such as Punto Digital, it’s essential to strengthen cross-sector collaboration, invest in data governance to identify excluded groups, and align national frameworks with community needs. Argentina can leverage these pathways to turn widespread access into meaningful digital opportunities.
Where Strategic Vision Meets Local Capacity
The experiences of Catalonia and Argentina highlight two complementary approaches to digital inclusion, with one approach focusing on innovation and evidence at the ecosystem level, and the other emphasizing community access and local presence. When social organizations, government, and the tech sector come together around a shared vision of digital transformation, prioritizing coordinated governance and a rights-based approach to data, remarkable possibilities emerge, as seen in Catalonia.
The power of local, community-based infrastructure in reaching overlooked populations is demonstrated by Argentina, but it also underscores the necessity of improved coordination, data governance, and regulatory clarity. When viewed side by side, these cases highlight a crucial point: achieving digital inclusion necessitates a combination of top-down strategic planning and bottom-up capacity building.
Toward a Digital Social Contract for Equitable Cities
Digital inclusion requires a comprehensive approach, moving beyond siloed initiatives and short-term programs. Coherent, long-term policy frameworks are necessary to align infrastructure, regulation, funding, and community needs. Public services should adhere to strong frameworks that establish clear standards for accessibility, affordability, interoperability, and data protection. They guarantee that digital rights are protected, investments target underserved areas, and local governments, social organizations, and the private sector collaborate to achieve common objectives.
Responsible data governance is a central pillar of these frameworks. Fundamental to public trust, cities expanding digital services must address questions of data ownership, consent, transparency, and security. It is essential for residents to be aware of who collects their data, the purpose of collection, and the safeguards in place. Individuals must possess the capacity to grant or revoke consent, comprehend the utilization of their information, and reap benefits from systems engineered to mitigate risks and prevent misuse. To safeguard individuals from new vulnerabilities, digital transformation must prioritize transparent data practices and robust security standards.
Also, public-private partnerships play a critical role. Private innovation can be a powerful tool for expanding infrastructure, promoting digital literacy, and developing accessible technologies when it aligns with public goals. To ensure equity, rights, and accountability, clear regulatory frameworks are necessary for these partnerships to operate effectively.
Bridging the digital divide goes beyond just providing connectivity. We need a digital social contract that is based on rights, equity, and shared responsibility. To prevent digital transformation from perpetuating existing inequalities, governments, social organizations, communities, and the private sector must collaborate to create a pathway that promotes inclusion, opportunity, and dignity.
Digital inclusion is a continuous process that requires long-term commitment. One of the most powerful tools we possess for creating livable, equitable, and resilient cities is remaining.
